The ongoing legal proceedings surrounding Roman Storm, the founder of Tornado Cash, have taken a significant turn as he publicly claimed on social media that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is obstructing his ability to call expert witnesses in his defense. Set to commence on July 14, less than two months away, the trial has already sparked considerable debate within the cryptocurrency community.

Storm initially intended to call upon six expert witnesses to provide testimony regarding various aspects of blockchain technology, digital privacy, tokenomics, and compliance issues related to Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. However, the DOJ has reportedly rejected five of these witnesses entirely, with only one—Matthew Edman—remaining under severe restrictions. Edman, whose expertise could potentially shed light on blockchain-related matters, faces limitations that significantly curtail his potential contribution to the case.

This legal conflict centers around Tornado Cash, a decentralized privacy protocol that has been embroiled in controversy since 2023 when the U.S. government imposed sanctions alleging its involvement with North Korean hackers. Storm has consistently contested these accusations, culminating in the current trial and the ensuing dispute over the admissibility of expert witnesses.

Following Storm's public statement regarding the DOJ's actions, several high-profile figures and organizations within the crypto space have rallied in support by contributing funds to his legal defense. This includes repeated appeals for donations throughout the course of the case. Despite these efforts, the DOJ has cited numerous grounds for rejecting Storm’s proposed experts, arguing that their areas of expertise—ranging from digital privacy to tokenomics—are either irrelevant or improperly vetted.

Prosecutors dismissed each topic proposed by the defense with skepticism, emphasizing that the role of an expert witness does not extend to offering legal opinions such as determining whether KYC regulations apply to Tornado Cash. Such decisions are expected to be made by the presiding judge and jury. Furthermore, the charges against Storm include conspiracy to violate international sanctions, a charge that many of the excluded witnesses fail to directly address.

Even though the U.S. Treasury has since removed Tornado Cash from its sanctions list, the platform remains under close scrutiny. Last month, the DOJ reasserted its stance against Storm, aiming for a conviction. In response, Storm may need to identify additional witnesses whose testimonies can more directly address the core allegations against him.

Despite these challenges, support for Storm persists within the broader crypto community. Notably, the Ethereum Foundation recently announced contributions totaling $1.25 million toward Storm’s legal defense. This financial backing suggests that Storm will likely possess sufficient resources to mount a robust defense during the trial. Nevertheless, the absence of key expert witnesses could pose substantial obstacles to presenting a comprehensive case.

As the trial date approaches, all eyes remain fixed on how both sides will navigate this complex legal landscape, particularly given the broader implications for decentralized finance and privacy-focused technologies.

以上内容由悟空财富根据公开信息整理，与本站立场无关，如存在问题请联系我们，本文为数据整理，不对您构成任何投资建议，投资有风险，请谨慎决策。