Following Strategy's lead, an increasing number of companies have been investing in Bitcoin, a trend further supported by the cryptocurrency's rising price. This wave of massive acquisitions has sparked concerns about potential market collapses if companies are compelled to sell, as well as doubts about Bitcoin's decentralized nature.

Representatives from Bitwise, Komodo Platform, and Sentora argue that the advantages of these investments significantly outweigh the risks. Although smaller, over-leveraged companies might face bankruptcy, their influence on the market would be negligible. They do not foresee any immediate risks, given that successful companies like MicroStrategy show no indications of liquidating their assets.

The number of companies participating in this corporate Bitcoin acquisition trend is expanding. While Standard Chartered recently reported that at least 61 publicly listed firms had purchased cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin Treasuries data indicates that the figure has climbed to 130.

As Strategy (formerly known as MicroStrategy) continues to accumulate billions in unrealized gains through its aggressive Bitcoin purchases, buoyed by Bitcoin's rising price, more companies are expected to follow this approach.

His belief is based on multiple factors.

Despite its volatility, Bitcoin has historically delivered exceptionally high returns compared to traditional asset classes such as stocks and gold.

Although past performance does not ensure future results, Bitcoin's current stability may encourage more companies to acquire the asset.

At the same time, as global markets contend with economic challenges, Bitcoin could become an attractive option for enhancing weak financial statements.

The U.S. and the broader global economy have faced geopolitical tensions, rising inflation rates, and concerning fiscal deficits. Recognized as \"digital gold\" and a neutral store of value, Bitcoin has attracted the attention of various stakeholders, especially following Strategy's success.

He predicted that the day Bitcoin surpasses traditional safe-haven assets like U.S. Treasury bills and gold will eventually arrive. As adoption increases, Bitcoin's volatility is likely to decrease, making it a highly competitive asset across the board.

Moreover, Bitcoin's technological foundation provides it with a competitive edge over other asset classes.

However, not all companies are alike. While some stand to gain, others do not.

According to Rasmussen, there are two types of Bitcoin treasury companies.

They are either profitable enterprises utilizing surplus cash, such as Coinbase or Square, or firms securing debt or equity to purchase Bitcoin. Irrespective of the category, their accumulation boosts Bitcoin demand, driving its price upward in the short term.

Profitable businesses purchasing Bitcoin with excess cash are rare and pose no systemic risk. Rasmussen anticipates these companies will continue acquiring Bitcoin in the long run.

Companies relying on debt or equity might encounter a different outcome.

The success of these companies hinges on how much profit they must use to repay their debts.

Larger, established companies always possess more resources than smaller ones to handle their debt.

According to Dragosch, the key to preventing such scenarios for smaller companies is to avoid over-leveraging. In other words, borrow only what you can afford to repay.

Nevertheless, these liquidations would have minimal market impacts.

The real issue arises when larger entities decide to sell their holdings.

More companies incorporating Bitcoin into their balance sheets contribute to decentralization, at least at the market level. Strategy is no longer the sole corporation adopting this strategy.

That said, Strategy's holdings are substantial. Currently, it holds nearly 600,000 Bitcoins—approximately 3% of the total supply. This level of centralization does carry liquidation risks.

Some experts believe such a situation is improbable. If it were to occur, Stadelmann predicts that initial negative consequences would eventually stabilize.

However, the significant quantity of Bitcoin owned by a few large corporations rekindles concerns about the centralization of the asset itself rather than competition.

Large corporate accumulations raise worries about concentrated ownership of Bitcoin's limited supply. This challenges a core DeFi principle and stirs anxiety about disrupting its foundational structure.

According to Dragosch, this is not the case. No one can alter Bitcoin's rules by holding most of the supply.

Conversely, Pellicer acknowledges these concerns but sees them as a trade-off for the other advantages of widespread adoption.

With companies increasingly leveraging Bitcoin for strategic financial benefits, its journey toward becoming a widely recognized reserve asset is speeding up. For now, the risk of a market collapse appears to be under control.

以上内容由悟空财富根据公开信息整理，与本站立场无关，如存在问题请联系我们，本文为数据整理，不对您构成任何投资建议，投资有风险，请谨慎决策。